@incollection{22758,
  address               = {Canberra},
  author                = {Conrad, Robert J. and Ronald K. Lewis},
  booktitle             = {Papers in New Guinea Linguistics 26},
  editor                = {Geoffrey P. Smith...},
  pages                 = {243-273},
  publisher             = {Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University},
  series                = {Pacific Linguistics: Series A},
  title                 = {Some language and sociolinguistic relationships in the Upper Sepik region of Papua New Guinea},
  volume                = {76},
  year                  = {1988},
  bestfn                = {papua\conrad-lewis_upper-sepik1988_o.pdf},
  besttxt               = {ptxt\papua\conrad-lewis_upper-sepik1988.txt},
  citekeys              = {cldf9:6ef8783d73140a616fc3d27d7330d503},
  copied_from           = {HHOLD},
  document_type         = {CH},
  fn                    = {papua\conrad-lewis_upper-sepik1988.pdf, papua\conrad-lewis_upper-sepik1988_o.pdf},
  hhtype                = {overview;comparative;wordlist},
  inlg                  = {English [eng]},
  isreferencedby        = {cldf9},
  langnote              = {Pikaru 1, Bikaru (Bragge), Bisorio, Enga, Piame, Biame (Bragge), Hewa 1 plus more lexicostatistical figures on Leonard Schulze and Sepik Hill languages. I think Bikaru (Bragge) is Pikaru despite the divergence of the two, since the body part terms agree and the elicitation session was monolingual. For the same reason I think Biame (Bragge) is Piame.},
  lgcode                = {Pikaru 1 this is likely a variety of Bisorio [bir], Bikaru (Bragge) = Bikaru [bic], Enga [enq], Piame [pin], Biame (Bragge) = Piame [pin], Hewa 1 [ham], Bisorio [bir]},
  local_ids             = {12279},
  macro_area            = {Papunesia},
  mpi_eva_library_shelf = {bound with PL 6601 PAP NEW - 26},
  src                   = {cldf, hh, mpieva, silpng}
}