Family: Sino-Tibetan

Classification

Family membership references
Comments on family membership

Hruso-Aka [hru] is clearly not a Miji dialect as held by Shafer, Robert 1947. The shared lexicon is attributable to loans, and of what remains, there are insufficient Tibeto-Burman parallels for a Tibeto-Burman affiliation (Padun, Mahendra 1971), (Roger Blench and Mark Post 2011) (Gregory D. S. Anderson and Ganesh Murmu and K. David Harrison 2013), (Gregory D. S. Anderson 2014). The Kamengic group, Puroik, Miju, Mishmic and Koro-Milang show little Tibeto-Burman cognacy, but what they do show is slightly in favour of inheritance (rather than borrowing) since they occur in the basic vocabulary (Roger Blench and Mark Post 2011), (Robbins Burling 2003), (Mark Post and Roger Blench 2011) (Gregory D. S. Anderson and Ganesh Murmu and K. David Harrison 2013), (Gregory D. S. Anderson 2014) and in grammar in the case of Koro-Milang (Gregory D. S. Anderson and Ganesh Murmu and K. David Harrison 2013).

References

Details Name Title ca Year Pages Doctype ca Provider da