@article{475991,
  address    = {Amsterdam/Philadephia},
  author     = {Hagemeijer, Tjerk},
  journal    = {Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages},
  number     = {1},
  pages      = {111-154},
  publisher  = {John Benjamins Publishing Company},
  title      = {The Gulf of Guinea creoles: genetic and typological relations},
  url        = {https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.26.1.05hag},
  volume     = {26},
  year       = {2011},
  abstract   = {Especially since Ferraz (1974, 1975, 1979), it has been generally accepted that the four Gulf of Guinea creoles (GGCs) — Santome (ST), Angolar (ANG), Lung’ie (LU), and Fa d’Ambô (FA)2 — are closely related languages based on historical and linguistic data. Ferraz shares his view on the type of genetic relation between these creoles in the following quote:},
  bestfn     = {africa\hagemeijer_gulf-guinea-creoles2011.pdf},
  besttxt    = {ptxt\africa\hagemeijer_gulf-guinea-creoles2011.txt},
  cfn        = {africa\hagemeijer_gulf-guinea-creoles2011.pdf},
  delivered  = {africa\hagemeijer_gulf-guinea-creoles2011.pdf},
  doi        = {10.1075/jpcl.26.1.05hag},
  fn         = {africa\hagemeijer_gulf-guinea-creoles2011_o.pdf, africa\hagemeijer_gulf-guinea-creoles2011.pdf},
  hhtype     = {overview;comparative},
  inlg       = {English [eng]},
  issn       = {0920-9034},
  keywords   = {Gulf of Guinea creoles, Edo, Western Bantu, Niger Delta, substrate influence, creole typology, areal features},
  macro_area = {Africa},
  src        = {benjamins, hh}
}